They are all portable, meaning that no installation is required, and you can carry them around with you on a removable USB stick, for instance, to use them on the go, whenever needed. There are over 70 applications in the suite, which are also available separately, but having them downloaded all in an all-in-one package is much more convenient. A plethora of portable, powerful applications Originally co-developed and now maintained by Mark Russinovich from Microsoft, the software utilities inside the Sysinternals Suite are delivered to the wide public at no cost, providing some of the top useful tools to have around for diagnostics and troubleshooting. My biggest gripe is that I press X and it actually closes itself so the graphs hadn't been capturing when I go back to look at it.Windows comes with its own administration and management tools and the palette of options in the online world is quite variate, but no package is quite as indispensable to a system administrator as the Sysinternals Suite. I'm sure some of this is accessible somewhere in the internals of ProcExp but I've greatly enjoyed Process Hacker.
And finally, the filter field is in the top-right of the main window, which makes it a lot easier to get to.
The better visibility of I/O traffic makes it simple to associate, for example, the internal handle for the mouse object, since my mouse requires intercepting/sampling to use all 7 buttons. The "System Information" graph is much more informative in that you can mouse over the spikes and see which process is causing them. You can set it to permanently remember process priorities and automatically apply them. Process properties show tokens, much better overall/accumulated stats view for a process, process modules and heap regions, and so on. It's easier to supervise the activity by using the tabs on the main window to see all ongoing Disk, Network, or Service jobs. There are more graphs per process and the interface is customizable.
So using handle -s to get a summary, my system shows this - I would think all would be represented in Procexp: Do you mean handle types it represents, or does it show handles from sub-processes? I've found the content to be the same as I get from handle.exe from Russinovich. I don't understand the question, likely because I'm not a programmer.
0 kommentar(er)
